I was looking at the schedule for ABA TechShow 2009, and at the top it says “What won’t you learn?”
The answer now seems obvious: you won’t learn anything about open source applications.
And not just at TechShow, but at most legal conferences, and I’d wager at most legal gatherings: MILOFest, State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting, Inside Counsel Superconference…the list goes on. Granted, open source applications may not apply, but if the conferences/gatherings can discuss social media, alternative billing and topics that signal a shift in legal practice, why do they ignore open source? Especially as the legal profession continues to struggle on the labor front. Lawyers are still being laid off, and there are solo and small firm practices popping up with smaller budgets that can benefit from open source. They can benefit, if they know about it.
Open source is gaining traction in the legal professional, sure, which is another reason it strikes me as odd that open source is being ignored by legal conferences and gatherings. Not all, to be sure. Some local bar associations have had speakers come in and talk about open source, and when I’ve written about open source for lawyers, I get emails happy to see someone else talking about it. There are signs of life, but it remains a minority, more so than Macs in Law Offices, I’d wager.
So what is it about open source that prevents legal conferences from having any session related to it? Lack of presenters? Or perhaps no one has suggested the topic? No one has submitted a presentation on open source? Fear of lack of interest? Perceived lack of value?
I’m interested in your thoughts on this, especially people who run these conferences. I think open source sessions are needed. What do you think?